MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tell it to the World

2023· book· en· W4389732431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Savran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Culture and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusicalWorld War IITheatre directorGermanStyle (visual arts)Visual artsHistoryArtLiteratureArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tell It to the World: The Broadway Musical Abroad studies how the Broadway musical has traveled the world, influencing and transforming local idioms and traditions. It focuses on the ways the musical has been indigenized in South Korea and Germany, two nations occupied by the United States after World War II that have become key commercial centers for Broadway musicals. By the 1990s, Broadway imports were all the rage in both, while home-grown musicals transformed the US prototypes. Part I of the book considers the fundamental questions: What is a musical? Why is it the great success story of US theatre? How has it been assimilated to musical theatre traditions around the world? Part II focuses on musical theatre in South Korea, studying the import/export business in large-scale musicals about Korean history and innovative experiments that mix local performance traditions with the Broadway style. Part III moves to Germany to survey the history of musicals from 1945 until the fall of the Berlin Wall, the reconfiguration of musical theatre conventions by experimental directors, and the groundbreaking German-language productions of Broadway classics by Barrie Kosky and other innovative directors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAsian Culture and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207