MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389734740 · doi:10.1504/ijvsmt.2023.135460

Filtering based sensor fusion positioning methods: literature review

2023· article· en· W4389734740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensor fusionEngineeringComputer scienceFusionSystems engineeringControl engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a detailed review of filtering-based techniques for localising mobile robots. Localisation and increasing accuracy of positioning is a key field of research for autonomous navigation and mobile robotics. Several techniques based on the Kalman Filter are examined and relevant research and studies using these techniques for localisation are highlighted in the proceeding sections of this paper. The main filtering techniques include: the Linear Kalman Filter, Extended Kalman Filter and Unscented Kalman Filter. The results of presented studies are examined with limitations and meaningful results discussed. In short, this paper aims to summarise recent applications of mobile robot positioning, displaying the current state of the literature and research regarding Kalman Filter-based techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it