AIRBORNE SAFETY IN THE AGE OF 5G: ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL INTERFERENCE BETWEEN C-BAND AND AERONAUTICAL RADAR ALTIMETER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The recent deployment of 5G technology in the C-band frequency range has raised concerns regarding potential interference with aeronautical radar altimeters. 5G technology utilizes the C-band in the range of 3.7–3.98 GHz, which partially overlaps with the frequency range used by radar altimeters operating in the range of 4.2–4.4 GHz, resulting in an increased possibility of interference between the two systems. In this study, a comprehensive methodology was employed to conduct an interference analysis, investigating the compatibility between 5G wireless systems and radar altimeters. This involved implementing a realistic scenario that replicated the operational interaction between radar altimeters and 5G systems, with the goal of identifying the impact of 5G networks on radar altimeter performance. This paper outlines the scenarios leading to interference, and suggests feasible methods to overcome this issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".