Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet essai sollicité par Perspective pour célébrer le vingtième anniversaire de la publication de son livre, Couture Culture: A Study in Modern Art and Fashion (Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 2003), Nancy J. Troy revient sur sa trajectoire intellectuelle, depuis sa formation d’historienne de l’art dans les années 1970 jusqu’à son adhésion, des décennies plus tard, aux études de mode comme un domaine analytique et critique de premier plan, qui ne le cède en rien, par son ambition et son potentiel, à la pensée historique de l’art la plus avancée de l’époque. L’auteure fait référence à de nombreux interlocuteurs pour expliquer comment elle a surmonté son scepticisme initial à l’égard des arts décoratifs et de la mode pour conduire de nouvelles recherches interdisciplinaires sur l’art moderne et la culture visuelle, comme en témoigne sa publication la plus récente, Mondrian’s Dress: Yves Saint Laurent, Piet Mondrian, and Pop Art (Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 2023).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".