MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389739884 · doi:10.1080/13647830.2023.2292993

Large eddy simulations of a buoyant turbulent line flame using conditional source-term estimation (CSE)

2023· article· en· W4389739884 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCombustion Theory and Modelling · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMechanicsTurbulenceRadiative transferLarge eddy simulationCombustorRadiationChemistryComputational physicsCombustionThermodynamicsPhysicsStatistical physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to assess the capabilities of the Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) approach applied to a laboratory scaled turbulent buoyant flame without extinction. CSE is coupled with the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) solver, FireFOAM. Tabulated detailed chemistry is included. Radiation is treated using the optically thin model using four different implementations and the effect of subgrid scale (sgs) Turbulence-Radiation Interactions (TRI) is considered. Predictions of time-averaged temperatures and corresponding root mean square (rms) are compared with the experimental measurements at several locations. Further, flame shape, unconditional and conditional species mass fractions, axial velocity and mixture fraction are also examined for qualitative analysis. The predicted temperatures are in good agreement with the experimental data, except very close to the fuel inlet. The predicted temperatures increase more slowly compared to the experimental data in the first 0.09 m above the burner. The temperature rms is in reasonable agreement with experimental data with the peak being overpredicted by approximately 17%. The predicted flame height closely matches the experimental value. The temperature predictions are consistent with previously published results. Best predictions are obtained when the effect of sgs TRI is included. For this flame, the optically thin assumption is found to be valid, in agreement with previous investigations. The calculated radiative fraction is found to be close to the experimental value, but the postprocessed heat release rate is larger than the experimental finding. This first LES-CSE study provides a good foundation for further developments, for example more detailed radiation models, for more complex fire cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it