MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389747912 · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3342752

3D Printed Multifunctional Polymeric Nanocomposite Components With Sensing Capability

2023· article· en· W4389747912 on OpenAlexafffund
Alaa Alawy, Advait Deshmukh, Angela Le, Simon S. Park

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta InnovatesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKorea Institute of Industrial Technology
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanocomposite3D printingComposite materialPiezoresistive effectExtrusionBending3d printedFused deposition modelingCarbon nanotubeFlexural strengthElectrical conductorGauge factorNanotechnologyFabrication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional polymeric 3D printing offers efficient ways to produce 3D structures. In order to provide functional capability of 3D structures, we have incorporated conductive additives such as multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) within the 3D printed structures by utilizing a pellet-based extrusion system. The inclusion of MWCNTs in the nanocomposites allows the creation of semiconductive structures that can detect force or strain due to piezoresistive properties. During the printing process, the shear forces can cause the MWCNTs to partially align, and this alignment is influenced by the chosen path scanning strategies. Our study aimed to determine how the alignment of MWCNTs affects the mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties of 3D-printed nanocomposite objects. We employed various characterization techniques including SEM, resistivity measurements, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), three-point bending, and cyclic bending tests at different raster angles (0°, 45°, and 90°) of 3D printed parts. A 3D Random Walk model was developed to simulate the influence of MWCNTs alignment on the piezoresistive behavior. The experimental results showed low electrical resistivity and high flexural strength in 3D printed samples, especially when printed in a longitudinal direction (0°). The highest sensing gauge factor was achieved when printing laterally (90°). To demonstrate the real-world applicability, we designed a self-sensing claw system for grippers with an integrated feedback mechanism using the 3D-printed nanocomposite. This study highlights the potentials of pellet-fed polymeric nanocomposite 3D printing for generating semiconductive structures with sensing capabilities in diverse applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207