Corruption in Brazil: Perceptions, Causes and Consequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article conducts a thorough examination of corruption in Brazil, spanning its infiltration into everyday scenarios to its profound impact on the country’s political, economic, and social spheres. It investigates prevalent instances of fraudulent practices in daily life, particularly in dining establishments, underscoring the challenge of combating this deeply ingrained culture of dishonesty due to underreporting. The piece highlights the extensive investigations into alleged criminal activities involving a significant proportion of Brazilian lawmakers and emphasizes the judiciary’s slow response in prosecuting accused officials. Moreover, it delves into the adverse effects of corruption on the economy, citing its deterrent effect on foreign investments, exacerbation of income disparities, and contribution to economic instability. Criticisms of the government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic are discussed, including the intervention of the Federal Supreme Court to scrutinize government actions. Proposing a mathematical model to comprehend and prevent crimes, it explores the intricate connections between various crime types, public security policies, and corruption. Finally, the article concludes by advocating empirical testing of this model and suggesting methodologies to construct comprehensive indices for diverse crime categories, offering an exhaustive analysis of corruption’s multifaceted impact on Brazilian society, economy, and political framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".