MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Is There Any Relationship between Scoliosis, Cervical Pain and Postural Imbalance in Parkinson’s Disease? A Cross-Sectional, Pilot Study

2023· preprint· en· W4389751726 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gianpaolo Ronconi, Mariantonietta Ariani, Dario Mattia Gatto, Gioia Stefinlongo, Fabio Ingravalle, Daniele Coraci, Sefora Codazza, Maurizio Panunzio, Giorgio Ferriero, Paola Emilia Ferrara

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease and Spinal Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance (ability)Tinetti testScoliosisMedicinePhysical therapyNeck painBerg Balance ScalePhysical medicine and rehabilitationParkinson's diseaseGaitVisual analogue scaleCross-sectional studyObservational studyCobb angleDiseaseSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Parkinsons’s disease is characterized by progressive worsening of gait, posture and balance with disability in daily life activities and to improvement in chronic musculoskeletal pain, often in neck pain associated with worsening of balance. The aim of the study is to investigate the correlation between scoliosis, balance and cervical pain in Parkinson’s disease. Methods: Cross-sectional, pilot study. A total of 16 Parkinson’s patients were enrolled in the study. The Pain Visual analogue scale and the short form McGill pain questionnaire measured neck cervical pain; static balance, Tinetti, Berg Balance and Short Physical Performance Battery scales(SPPB) were used to evaluate dynamic balance. Whole-spine standard X-ray assess spinal scoliosis with Cobb angles measurement .An observational statistical analysis was performed with the patients subdivided into a non-scoliosis (NS) group and a true scoliosis (TS) group based on whether they presented a Cobb’s angle below or ≥10°. Results: Frequency of neck pain in the NS group was 37% compared to 50% in the TS group. A non-statistically significant difference was found in terms of static, dynamic balance and cervical pain scores between NS and TS groups. Conclusions: Scoliosis, cervical pain and postural imbalance are significant yet often overlooked complaints in PD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicParkinson's Disease and Spinal DisordersFrench-language works237,207