Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Materi Laporan Wawancara dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Open Ended Berbantuan Video untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menyimak dan Menulis Kelas IV SD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kemampuan siswa dalam menyimak dan menulis adalah termasuk dalam kemampuan dasar dalam kegiatan pembelajaran di sekolah terutama dalam muatan pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Tujuan pada penelitian ini adalah untuk menelaah kemampuan menyimak dan menulis. Populasi pada penelitian ini merupakan siswa kelas IV A dan IV B di SDN 1 Kayuambon sedangkan sampelnya sebanyak 10 siswa pada uji coba terbatas dan pada uji luas sebanyak 20 siswa. Instrumen pada penelitian ini menggunakan tes. Hasil pada penelitian ini berdasarkan hasil dan pembahasannya dapat disimpulkan adanya pengaruh penggunaan bahan ajar materi laporan wawancara dengan menggunakan pendekatan open ended berbantuan video untuk meningkatkannya kemampuan menyimak dan menulis pada siswa kelas IV SD yang dapat dibuktikan oleh nilai Sig (2-tailed) yang hasilnya sebesar 0,000 < 0,05.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".