MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389765564 · doi:10.32388/9bbvde

Review of: "Sociosexuality Expanded: The Role of Light and Dark Personality Traits"

2023· peer-review· en· W4389765564 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Faucher

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPersonality Traits and Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonalityBig Five personality traitsPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare.The paper focuses on documenting the associations between the Light Triad and Dark Triad, and tridimensional sociosexuality.Results from correlation and regression analyses highlight associations between light and dark personality traits and sociosexuality components, especially of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen Psychopathy.I found this paper to be an interesting effort at documenting the role of light and dark personality traits on a specific component of relational/social functioning, and my comments are mostly targeted towards adding on to the manuscript rather than modifying what is currently included.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.115
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.115
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPersonality Traits and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207