Absence of Ductus Venosus: A Comparison of 2 Distinctive Fetal Autopsy Cases and Embryologic Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In fetal circulation, oxygenated blood from the placenta flows through the umbilical vein into the ductus venosus (DV), then enters the inferior vena cava, and subsequently reaches the right atrium of the heart. The DV serves as a shunt, allowing this oxygen-rich blood to bypass the liver. The absence of the DV (ADV), also known as agenesis of the DV, is a rare congenital anomaly. Without a DV, blood from the umbilical vein must follow alternative routes to the heart. In ADV cases, blood from the umbilical vein must follow 1 of 2 primary drainage patterns: either an extrahepatic shunt or an intrahepatic shunt. This report details the antenatal ultrasound and postmortem findings of 2 fetuses diagnosed with ADV by prenatal imaging studies. The first case involved a fetus with a persistent right umbilical vein connected directly to the suprahepatic IVC, accompanied by early obliteration of the left umbilical vein and true agenesis of the DV. This fetus also had additional congenital anomalies. In contrast, the second case involved a fetus with a normal left umbilical vein that entered the liver. However, despite an ultrasound diagnosis of "absence" of the DV, a DV was present, though markedly hypoplastic and probably minimally functional or non-functional. In this case, blood from the umbilical vein likely followed an alternate intrahepatic route through the portal and hepatic veins, before reaching the heart (intrahepatic shunt). These contrasting cases emphasize the heterogeneity of vascular anomalies and embryologic origins captured by the term "ADV." Additionally, the terminology of "absence" or "agenesis" may be misleading in some purported ADV cases. Specifically, in the second case, the DV was not absent; it was markedly hypoplastic instead. This also appears to be the first reported case of a hypoplastic DV in a fetus. Both cases underscore the importance of effective collaboration and clear communication between maternal-fetal medicine specialists and pathologists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".