Detection of illicit phrasal movement in Huntington’s disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of the basal ganglia has been a longstanding issue in neural language models. Huntington’s disease (HD) shows primary impairment in the striatum and has previously been shown to affect the processing of phrase-structural hierarchies that are built by phrasal movement (e.g. in passives). Here we asked patients with HD to judge the acceptability of sentences containing different types of illicit phrasal movement, which were contrasted with semantic violations involving no movement. A logistic mixed-effects regression showed that patients had a profound impairment in judging incorrect but not correct sentences across all types of illicit movement, while the semantic condition was also affected, but significantly less so. Adding neuropsychological variables to the model did not improve predictions. These results demonstrate a loss of cognitive control, worsening with disease progression, over phrase-structural hierarchies, which extends to forms of meaning built at sentential levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it