Emission, propagation, and reflection of light as mechanical phenomena applied to the Majorana experiment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emission, propagation, and reflection of light as mechanical phenomena applied to the Michelson‐Morley experiment offer a zero-fringe shift in Earth's inertial frame. Differently, in the Majorana experiment, the light from a fixed source reflected by moving and fixed mirrors enters the Michelson interferometer with unequal arms and offers a noticeable fringe shift. According to Majorana's interpretation, the fringe shift is proof of the constancy of light velocity. In contrast to Majorana's conclusion, the light reflected by a moving mirror has a different speed, wavelength, and frequency from the incident light, and the fringe shift observed in Majorana's experiment indicates that the velocity of light depends on its source velocity. Majorana's derivation predicts a <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.71</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> fringe shift, and this study predicts a <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.27</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> fringe shift.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it