MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389802848 · doi:10.1159/000534105

Management of Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphema Syndrome Caused by Soemmering Ring Cataract: Case Report and Literature Review

2023· article· en· W4389802848 on OpenAlexaff
Charles-David Dubois, Po Hsiang Yuan, Georges M. Durr

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Ophthalmology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUltrasound biomicroscopyHyphemaOphthalmologyGlaucomaUveitisIntraocular lensSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a rare case of Soemmering's ring-induced uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome, caused by an undisplaced, in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) 16 years after implantation. The presenting symptoms were recurrent episodes of transient monocular vision loss, which prompted extensive unremarkable investigations. Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) eventually revealed an enlarging Soemmering's ring contacting the posterior iris and causing UGH syndrome. This is a unique case because the IOL haptics remained in the bag. Anterior vitrectomy, Soemmering's ring extraction, IOL exchange to a 3-piece IOL, and implantation of a trabecular meshwork bypass microstent were performed. IOP control and both functional and structural stability were achieved long term. Soemmering's ring-induced UGH syndrome should be on the differential of a patient with previous cataract surgery and elevated IOP complaining of visual disturbances. Early diagnosis with UBM and surgical intervention may provide optimal outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Reports in OphthalmologySame topicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeFrench-language works237,207