MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389805711 · doi:10.1016/j.engmic.2023.100135

Chromatographic and mass spectroscopic guided discovery of Trichoderma peptaibiotics and their bioactivity

2023· review· en· W4389805711 on OpenAlexaff
Adigo Setargie, Chen Wang, Liwen Zhang, Yuquan Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Microbiology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsBiotechnology Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsolation (microbiology)TrichodermaChromatographyChemistryPeptideAmino acidBiochemical engineeringCombinatorial chemistryComputational biologyBiotechnologyBiologyBiochemistryMicrobiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peptaibiotics are linear or cyclic peptide antibiotics characterized by the non-proteinogenic amino acid, alpha-aminoisobutyric acid. They exhibit a wide range of bioactivity against various pathogens. This report presents a comprehensive review of analytical methods for Trichoderma cultivation, production, isolation, screening, purification, and characterization of peptaibiotics, along with their bioactivity. Numerous techniques are currently available for each step, and we focus on describing the most commonly used and recently developed chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques. Investigating peptaibiotics requires efficient culture media, growth conditions, and isolation and purification techniques. The combination of chromatographic and spectroscopic tools offers a better opportunity for characterizing and identifying peptaibiotics. The evaluation of the chemical and biological properties of this compound has also been explored concerning its potential application in pharmaceutical and other industries. This review aims to summarize available data on the techniques and tools used to screen and purify peptaibiotics from Trichoderma fungi and bioactivity against various pathogens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering MicrobiologySame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207