Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteur·e étudie les figures et mondes impossibles en jeu vidéo. À cet effet, iel encadre ses recherches à l’aide d’écrits traitant de l’impossibilité en fiction, notamment certains travaux autour de la théorie des mondes possibles, et s’inspire de démarches touchant la notion de gestes afin de guider ses propres créations. Ces dernières, dont trois sont examinées dans cet article, impliquent chacune un geste de création distinct (l’alternance, la superposition et le mensonge) pour faire émerger des opérations d’annihilation du réel, lesquelles visent à transformer des composantes à l’intérieur d’un monde fictionnel vidéoludique afin de générer des impossibilités perçues. L’auteur·e discute du protocole similaire à chacune des œuvres, exemplifie quelques opérations engendrées par son processus de création, puis s’interroge sur certaines conséquences observées liées aux impossibilités vidéoludiques perçues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".