MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389829628 · doi:10.29173/af29496

Soutenir la posture littéraire dans la traduction des littératures autochtones vers l’espagnol

2023· article· fr· W4389829628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueALTERNATIVE FRANCOPHONE · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous nous proposons de démontrer l’importance de problématiser les processus de traduction des littératures autochtones vers l’espagnol afin de maintenir la posture littéraire de leurs autrices dans les versions traduites. Nous travaillons principalement sur le cas de l’écriture poétique de Natasha Kanapé-Fontaine, en analysant les difficultés textuelles auxquels nous avons été confrontées lors de la traduction d’une sélection de poèmes extraits de N’entre pas dans mon âme avec tes chaussures (2012) et de Bleuets et Abricots (2016) pour l’anthologie bilingue Mujer tierra, mujer poema, récemment publiée en Argentine. Ces textes actualisent des problématiques liées à l’identité des Premiers Peuples du Québec, ce qui nous amène à réfléchir sur la dimension créatrice de la poésie autochtone du sud du continent et à entamer le dialogue interculturel entre des productions de latitudes différentes. À cet égard, nous soulignons l’importance du rôle de la traduction pour rendre visible des littératures peu connues et favoriser la relation entre cultures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it