MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La féminisation de chefs de ménage à Haïti

2023· article· fr· W4389829829 on OpenAlexaff
David Jean Simon, Kenson Joissaint, M’Boh Delphin N’Gou, Ghislaine Joseph, Vénunyé Claude Kondo Tokpovi

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes caribéennes · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsResearch Unit on Children's Psychosocial MaladjustmentUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objectif de cet article était de dresser le profil des femmes cheffes de ménage et analyser les facteurs associés à ce phénomène à Haïti. Les données exploitées dans le cadre de ce travail de recherche proviennent des enquêtes démographiques et de santé réalisées à Haïti en 1994 et 2017 par l’Institut Haïtien de l’Enfance. L’analyse des données a été faite à deux niveaux : un niveau descriptif et un niveau explicatif multivarié à travers des modèles de régression multiniveaux. Les résultats ont révélé des changements au niveau du profil des femmes cheffes de ménage entre 1994 et 2017. De plus, il ressort que le milieu de résidence, l’âge, le niveau d’instruction, la taille du ménage et le niveau de vie sont les facteurs associés à la féminisation de chefs de ménage à Haïti.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes caribéennesSame topicMigration, Identity, and HealthFrench-language works237,207