Evaluating procedures in the NEH heuristic for the PFSP - SIST
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development and assessment of 48 heuristics for the sequence-independent setup time permutation flow shop problem (PFSP-SIST) are presented in this article. This contribution combines four tie-breaking solutions with twelve priority rules for the NEH heuristic fourth and first stage, respectively. Heuristics are evaluated on Ruiz and Allahverdi (2007) benchmark problem instances, that covers small, medium and large-size problems. The popular accelerations of Taillard were used in all tests, which were adapted to the sequence-independent setup time constraint. The aim is to reduce the longest job completion time, which is also referred to as makespan. Computation results show that using different tie-breaking strategies has a greater impact on performance than using different priority rules. The heuristics that presented the best results in relatively low computation time are those that use the FFs tie-breaking strategy procedure to the sequence-independent setup time problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it