Bibliographic record
Abstract
À l’aide d’un cadre théorique mettant l’accent sur l’extension du néolibéralisme, cet article analyse des données d’une recherche au sein du programme québécois Service spécialisé jeune. Il décrit la manière dont le workfare doux québécois insère des jeunes en difficulté d’insertion qui sont catégorisés comme n’étant ni en emploi, ni aux études, ni en formation au sein de dispositifs disciplinaires néolibéraux qui imitent le monde du travail. Dans ces dispositifs, ces jeunes sont accompagnés dans l’autogouvernement de leur insertion, notamment alors qu’ils poursuivent des objectifs et des projets professionnels. Il s’interroge finalement sur la capacité de ces politiques québécoises du workfare doux à insérer et à maintenir ces jeunes en emploi, aux études et en formation, alors que plusieurs d’entre eux composent avec des situations de précarité ainsi qu’avec des configurations du travail et des systèmes éducatifs qui sont fort complexes et imprévisibles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".