Effects of clamping end‐tidal CO<sub>2</sub> on neurofluidic low‐frequency oscillations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, low‐frequency oscillations (LFOs) (0.01–0.1 Hz) have been a subject of interest in resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging research. They are believed to have many possible driving mechanisms, from both regional and global sources. Internal fluctuations in the partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2) has long been thought of as one of these major driving forces, but its exact contributions compared with other mechanisms have yet to be fully understood. This study examined the effects of end‐tidal PCO2 (PetCO2) oscillations on LF cerebral hemodynamics and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics under “clamped PetCO2” and “free‐breathing” conditions. Under clamped PetCO2, a participant's PetCO2 levels were fixed to their baseline average, whereas PetCO2 was not controlled in free breathing. Under clamped PetCO2, the fractional amplitude of hemodynamic LFOs in the occipital and sensorimotor cortex and temporal lobes were found to be significantly reduced. Additionally, the fractional amplitude of CSF LFOs, measured at the fourth ventricle, was found to be reduced by almost one‐half. However, the spatiotemporal distributions of blood and CSF delay times, as measured by cross‐correlation in the LF domain, were not significantly altered between conditions. This study demonstrates that, while PCO2 oscillations significantly mediate LFOs, especially those observed in the CSF, other mechanisms are able to maintain LFOs, with high correlation, even in their absence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".