MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389878149 · doi:10.1021/acsaem.3c02040

Critical Investigation of Metal–Organic-Frameworks to Improve the Silicon Anode of Lithium-Ion Batteries

2023· article· en· W4389878149 on OpenAlexafffund
James Sturman, Mohamed S.E. Houache, Walace D. do Pim, Elena A. Baranova, Muralee Murugesu, Yaser Abu‐Lebdeh

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Energy Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersOffice of Energy Research and Development
KeywordsAnodeLithium metalLithium (medication)SiliconMaterials scienceMetal-organic frameworkNanotechnologyIonMetalNanoarchitectures for lithium-ion batteriesInorganic chemistryEngineering physicsOptoelectronicsChemistryMetallurgyElectrodeEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The poor capacity retention of the silicon (Si) anode has hindered its widespread use in lithium-ion batteries. Metal–organic-frameworks (MOF) may offer the structural and functional tunability needed to alleviate some of the longstanding problems associated with silicon pulverization. Herein, MOF-74 (Co-based) and MOF-199 (Cu-based) were implemented in different design configurations for high-Si loading electrodes. Multilayer sandwich configurations provided a modest improvement in capacity retention. However, greatest improvements in capacity retention were observed when the MOF was in situ synthesized onto the silicon surface (Si@MOF) and subsequently pyrolyzed. The best performing high-loading 0.5Si@MOF-c sample delivered a high capacity of 1000 mAh/g and retained 60% capacity after 100 cycles, surpassing a standard silicon-graphite composite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Energy MaterialsSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207