MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389880088 · doi:10.1109/mcom.002.2300317

Signaling Storm in O-RAN: Challenges and Research Opportunities

2023· article· en· W4389880088 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Magazine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)University of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsRanComputer scienceStormTelecommunicationsComputer networkOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O-RAN enables agile network architecture through programmable disaggregated units. However, the complexity and disaggregation of O-RAN may increase the risk of security incidents. Signaling storm is one of such incidents that disrupts network services through excessive control signals, and is yet unexplored in the context of O-RAN. In this article, we provide a holistic picture of open challenges and opportunities to address signaling storms in O-RAN. Specifically, we discuss different threat models for signaling storm, and explore their applicability to O-RAN. We also survey and categorize existing detection and mitigation solutions. Finally, we provide insights on leveraging key benefits of O-RAN to address signaling storms, and conclude by outlining future directions in this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.297
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.077 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it