MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Domain Adaptation Framework for Human Activity Monitoring Using Passive Wi-Fi Sensing

2023· article· en· W4389880287 on OpenAlexaff
Shervin Mehryar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware deploymentTask (project management)Adaptation (eye)Activity recognitionArtificial intelligenceInferenceDomain adaptationDeep learningDomain (mathematical analysis)Human–computer interactionReal-time computingSystems engineeringSoftware engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the omnipresence of radio frequency signals, the Channel State Information (CSI) can offer an alternate source to image, video, and other high-dimensional streams in a great many Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications. As a result, an ever increasing number of researchers are advocating for the use of passive CSI data for ranging, tracking, perception and automation across many domains such as robotics, healthcare, and surveillance. Specifically, in indoor applications where movements cause classifiable effects on the CSI, this resource from the existing infrastructure can be leveraged in order to provide a high-dimensional signal source for activity recognition. However, the task remains a challenge on two accounts. On the one hand, the radio frequency channel is highly susceptible to environment changes and artifacts. On the other hand, there is a lack of robust models that allow for practical deployment. In this work, we focus on tackling these issues for practical IoT applications through a layered architecture proposal. In the first layer, the task of inference for activity recognition is performed by a robust cross-modal deep learning network. In the next layer, a domain adaptation framework is proposed in order to achieve high deployment-time performance in target indoor environments. Our experiments verify that through few-shot training, using the proposed framework the activity classification performance increases substantially in practical settings over the state-of-the-art approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207