dimensions de l'envie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’être humain fait face au cours de sa vie à une multitude d’émotions, notamment la joie, la peine et la colère, qui sont ouvertement reconnues comme universelles, mais qu’en est-il de l’envie? Bien que l’envie soit présente dans toutes les cultures depuis le début de l’humanité, elle est stigmatisée, considérée comme moralement indésirable et souvent associée à des comportements socialement inacceptables. L'étude de l'envie en psychologie est encore un domaine relativement jeune avec peu d'études empiriques. Des instruments de mesure ont été construits afin de mesurer cette émotion; cependant, les auteurs ne s’entendent pas sur la structure complexe de l’envie. L’objectif de cet article est de parcourir les différentes conceptions de l’envie étayées dans la littérature et de proposer un cadre conceptuel pour d’éventuelles recherches sur le construit latent de l’envie, notamment en milieu de travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".