MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389882240 · doi:10.32920/24625176.v1

Tantalum-doped Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Fibers and Powders for Hemostatic Applications

2023· preprint· en· W4389882240 on OpenAlexaff
Malvika Nagrath

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemostasis and retained surgical items
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartial thromboplastin timeMesoporous materialHemostasisNuclear chemistryMaterials scienceChemistryCoagulationCatalysisMedicineBiochemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Hemorrhage is the leading cause of battlefield deaths and second most common cause for civilian mortality worldwide, and mesoporous BGs (MBGs), are candidates for hemostasis. </p> <p>Novel tantalum-containing MBG (Ta-MBG) powders: (80-<em>x</em>)SiO<sub>2</sub>-15CaO-5P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-<em>x</em>Ta<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> with <em>x</em>=0 (0Ta), 0.5 (0.5Ta), 1 (1Ta), 5 (5Ta), and 10 (10Ta), were developed using a sol-gel process. The powders were non-cytotoxic to bovine fibroblasts (MTT assay) and had a negative surface charge (-20.4 to -24.8 mV measured using zeta potential, ZP) which enhanced the intrinsic coagulation pathway (assessed using activated partial thromboplastin time, APTT). The powders (except 10Ta) showed lower hemolysis and APTT than ‘no treatment’ (physiological clotting). Among Ta-MBGs, 5Ta (11.6±5.8 sec) reduced APTT significantly compared to 1Ta (31.5±5.8 sec) and 10Ta (28±5.9 sec). Furthermore, lethal-liver-injury porcine trials of two best powders (5Ta and 1Ta) confirmed 5Ta as the most suitable composition for hemostasis. </p> <p>Powder hemostats pose handling and functional challenges in the wet surgical field; to address these challenges, the hemostatic compositions (0Ta, 0.5Ta, 1Ta, and 5Ta) were fabricated as fibrous mats using a combination of sol-gel route and electrospinning technique. </p> <p>The state-of-the-art analytical techniques showed fibers encompassing a hierarchical micro (0.5-2 µm) and nano (1-8 nm) porosity while the powders displaying unimodal mesopores (4 nm) leading to higher (298-374 m<sup>2</sup>g<sup>-1</sup>) surface areas than equivalent fibers (5-61 m<sup>2</sup>g<sup>-1</sup>). The ZP of the fibers (-26.2 to -48.7 mV) was better for hemostasis and stability in the wet environment than powders (-20.4 to -24.8 mV). The fibers were also non-cytotoxic to primary rat fibroblasts. The powders showed higher non-bridging oxygen-silicon (Si-NBO) bonds leading to higher ionic release than the fibers. Lower Si-NBO, lesser ionic release and more negative ZP provide advantageous stability to the fibers in wet environments. No significant differences between the bleeding times of powders and fibres was found using murine tail-bleed models. APTT suggested 1Ta composition to be most suitable among fibers to enhance hemostasis.</p> <p>It is concluded that 5Ta and 1Ta provide the best compositions to enhance hemostasis among powders and fibers, respectively. The structural and functional differences/similarities of two forms were not reflected in their hemostatic capabilities. Finally, the fibers provide a stable matrix for clot formation that can compress the bleeding site.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHemostasis and retained surgical itemsFrench-language works237,207