MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389883389 · doi:10.32920/24625125.v1

A Preliminary Investigation of a Hydrogen Injection Wedge Strut for a Scramject Combustor Application

2023· preprint· en· W4389883389 on OpenAlexaff
Antonella Ruta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustorScramjetInviscid flowMechanicsHydrogenMaterials scienceCombustionGeometryPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This M.Eng Report is a preliminary investigation of the strut geometry in a strut-based hydrogen scramjet combustor and assesses flow characteristics in an inviscid and viscid flow with no hydrogen injection, a viscid flow with hydrogen injection, and a viscid flow with hydrogen injection and combustion model. This investigation is performed using ANSYS Fluent. The viscid cases utilize the Shear Stress Transport (SST) k-omega model for turbulence, with the volumetric eddy dissipation model for combustion case. Results in this study are validated against the same wedge strut geometry and results from the Deutsches Zentrum für Luftund Raumfahrt (DLR) scramjet, by Waidmann [1], and a grid independence study is conducted for completeness. Performance of the different geometries are quantified by mixing efficiency, combustion efficiency, and total pressure recovery. The 2-dimensional results of this paper are comparable to the Schlieren images (shadow graphs) of the DLR combustor. The viscid case with no hydrogen injection is compared to the inviscid case with no hydrogen stream, resulting in the presence of boundary layers and shear layers. This increased the strength and quantity of shock/expansion wave reflections downstream of the strut. The addition of the hydrogen stream increased the thickness of the central wake region along the combustor, further increasing strength of the shock reflections, as well as creating a symmetric recirculation region downstream of the strut. The eddy-dissipation combustion model is applied, resulting in a larger, non-symmetric recirculation region. The combustion efficiency reached 78.42% with complete mixing at 245 mm along the combustor, whereas the non-combusting case achieved complete mixing at 225 mm along the combustor. The high entropy caused by the irreversible processes across several strong shocks in the combustion case attributed to a total pressure loss of 46%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207