Exploring Hyperspectral Imaging and 3D Convolutional Neural Network for Stress Classification in Plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) has emerged as a transformative technology in imaging, characterized by its ability to capture a wide spectrum of light, including wavelengths beyond the visible range. This approach significantly differs from traditional imaging methods such as RGB imaging, which uses three color channels, and multispectral imaging, which captures several discrete spectral bands. Through this approach, HSI offers detailed spectral signatures for each pixel, facilitating a more nuanced analysis of the imaged subjects. This capability is particularly beneficial in applications like agricultural practices, where it can detect changes in physiological and structural characteristics of crops. Moreover, the ability of HSI to monitor these changes over time is advantageous for observing how subjects respond to different environmental conditions or treatments. However, the high-dimensional nature of hyperspectral data presents challenges in data processing and feature extraction. Traditional machine learning algorithms often struggle to handle such complexity. This is where 3D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) become valuable. Unlike 1D-CNNs, which extract features from spectral dimensions, and 2D-CNNs, which focus on spatial dimensions, 3D CNNs have the capability to process data across both spectral and spatial dimensions. This makes them adept at extracting complex features from hyperspectral data. In this thesis, we explored the potency of HSI combined with 3D-CNN in agriculture domain where plant health and vitality are paramount. To evaluate this, we subjected lettuce plants to varying stress levels to assess the performance of this method in classifying the stressed lettuce at the early stages of growth into their respective stress-level groups. For this study, we created a dataset comprising 88 hyperspectral image samples of stressed lettuce. Utilizing Bayesian optimization, we developed 350 distinct 3D-CNN models to assess the method. The top-performing model achieved a 75.00\% test accuracy. Additionally, we addressed the challenge of generating valid 3D-CNN models in the Keras Tuner library through meticulous hyperparameter configuration. Our investigation also extends to the role of individual channels and channel groups within the color and near-infrared spectrum in predicting results for each stress-level group. We observed that the red and green spectra have a higher influence on the prediction results. Furthermore, we conducted a comprehensive review of 3D-CNN-based classification techniques for diseased and defective crops using non-UAV-based hyperspectral images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".