sécurité psychologique au travail : une perspective théorique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un nombre croissant de travaux se sont consacrés à la compréhension de la sécurité psychologique au travail, à l’identification des facteurs qui y contribuent et à l’examen de ses répercussions sur les individus, les équipes et les organisations. Toutefois, à notre connaissance, il n’existe aucune documentation en français qui fournit un aperçu de la littérature existante en matière de sécurité psychologique au travail. Cet article à perspective théorique vise donc à combler cette lacune en introduisant un bilan des connaissances actuelles sur le contexte et les définitions de la sécurité psychologique, ses bienfaits, ses déterminants, ainsi que les conditions (dé)favorables à la sécurité psychologique. Cet article suggère également des approches d’intervention pratique et propose de nouvelles pistes de recherche en ce qui a trait à la sécurité psychologique au travail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".