MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389894247 · doi:10.1186/s13012-023-01328-6

Correction: Identifying behaviour change techniques in 287 randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback interventions targeting practice change among healthcare professionals

2023· erratum· en· W4389894247 on OpenAlexaff
Jacob Crawshaw, Carly Meyer, Vivi Antonopoulou, Jesmin Antony, Jeremy Grimshaw, Noah Ivers, Kristin J. Konnyu, Meagan Lacroix, Justin Presseau, Michelle Simeoni, Sharlini Yogasingam, Fabiana Lorencatto

Bibliographic record

VenueImplementation Science · 2023
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalWomen's College HospitalMcMaster UniversityUniversity of OttawaHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHealth administrationHealth informaticsRandomized controlled trialPsychological interventionHealth services researchAuditHealth carePublic healthBehaviour changeAlternative medicineNursingFamily medicineSurgeryManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correction: Implement Sci 18, 63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-023-01318-8

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.476
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.476
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0110.012
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0090.005
Research integrity0.0180.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1150.061

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.710
GPT teacher head0.720
Teacher spread0.009 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImplementation ScienceSame topicHealth Policy Implementation ScienceFrench-language works237,207