Metabolomics in diabetes mellitus: clinical insight
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a chronic heterogeneous metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia due to the destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic β cells and/or insulin resistance. It is now considered a global epidemic disease associated with serious threats to a patient's life. Understanding the metabolic pathways involved in disease pathogenesis and progression is important and would improve prevention and management strategies. Metabolomics is an emerging field of research that offers valuable insights into the metabolic perturbation associated with metabolic diseases, including DM. AREA COVERED: Herein, we discussed the metabolomics in type 1 and 2 DM research, including its contribution to understanding disease pathogenesis and identifying potential novel biomarkers clinically useful for disease screening, monitoring, and prognosis. In addition, we highlighted the metabolic changes associated with treatment effects, including insulin and different anti-diabetic medications. EXPERT OPINION: By analyzing the metabolome, the metabolic disturbances involved in T1DM and T2DM can be explored, enhancing our understanding of the disease progression and potentially leading to novel clinical diagnostic and effective new therapeutic approaches. In addition, identifying specific metabolites would be potential clinical biomarkers for predicting the disease and thus preventing and managing hyperglycemia and its complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".