MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389900359 · doi:10.1080/01676830.2023.2295473

Orbital apex syndrome in herpes zoster ophthalmicus clinical features, treatment and outcomes: a case series and literature review

2023· review· en· W4389900359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrbit · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtraocular musclesHerpes Zoster OphthalmicusCavernous sinusComplicationOrbit (dynamics)Visual acuityApex (geometry)SurgeryOphthalmologyDermatologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orbital Apex Syndrome (OAS) complicating Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus (HZO) is associated with significant visual impairment. We present four patients with HZO OAS, to highlight clinical features and outcomes in order to promote earlier recognition and management of this potentially sight-threatening complication. CT and MRI imaging findings included expansion and enhancement of extraocular muscles and intraconal fat and involvement of the orbital apex and cavernous sinus. All patients received systemic steroid and antiviral therapy, but a standardised dosage and duration of treatment remains to be defined. Final visual acuity and extraocular motility outcomes were variable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it