Producción de las profesoras de la Universidad de Granada (España) en el último cuarto del siglo XX Women teachers' production at the University of Granada during the last quarter of the XXth century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se estudia la producción científica de las profesoras de la Universidad de Granada durante el periodo comprendido entre 1975-1990 desde una perspectiva de género. A partir de un análisis cuantitativo se analiza esta producción por tipo de publicaciones: artículos, tesis, comunicaciones, monografías, capítulos de libro, reseñas, videos y patentes; por áreas de conocimiento: Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, Ciencia y Tecnología y Ciencias Médicas y de la Vida; y por años. Además, se ofrece una visión global de los resultados de su investigación mediante el seguimiento de la producción hasta 1999. Se pretende conocer los medios de publicación utilizados por las profesoras para difundir sus investigaciones, las áreas de conocimiento en las que las profesoras son más productivas y la productividad a través de los años, teniendo en cuenta que el estudio abarca un periodo histórico de cambios -transición política española-. Scientific production of women teachers in the University of Granada during1975-1990 is studied from a gender perspective. Production by year and type of publication is quantitatively analyzed by areas of knowledge: humanities and social sciences, science and technology, and medical and life sciences, according to scholarly publications, thesis, monographs, book chapters, critical reviews, video recordings and patents. Additionally a vision of research results is offered by means of monitoring the said production up to 1999. Bearing in mind that the study covers a historical period of change (the so called Spanish political transition) the paper intends to know the means of publication used by women teachers in order to diffuse their research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".