A compact meander flexible UHF tag for industrial applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to introduce a novel design for a flexible Ultra-High Frequency tag (UHF tag) through the utilization of the meander line technique (MLA) and loop antenna method. The primary goal is to achieve a compact UHF tag operating at 868 MHz. The physical dimensions of the UHF tag are 110×12×0.1mm∘. The proposed UHF tag is manufactured using the inkjet printing method on a polyamide substrate featuring a relative dielectric constant of 3.5, a tangent loss of 0.0027, and a height of 0.0508 mm. Through electromagnetic simulation and validation, the functionality of the proposed UHF tag covers the UHF band ranging from 854.57 to 883.89 MHz, with a bandwidth of 29.32 MHz. The reflection coefficient at 868 MHz is approximately -22.46 dB. The simulated gain measures 1.79 dBi, while the theoretical read range is estimated at 5 meters. The UHF tag is produced using silver ink with a thickness of 0.05 mm and assembled using an anisotropic conductive paste (ACP). Subsequent to electromagnetic simulation, the UHF tag’s performance is confirmed through a reading test conducted with a radio frequency identification (RFID) base station. The results are consistent with the theoretical expectations, showcasing a commendable read range of 5 meters. To safeguard the UHF tag from challenging environmental conditions, it is enclosed within a polyethylene film (PE). Following encapsulation, the read range decreases to 3 meters, making it suitable for RFID applications requiring mid-range capabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".