MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389934533 · doi:10.33915/etd.12262

PROBABILISTIC SHORT TERM SOLAR DRIVER FORECASTING WITH NEURAL NETWORK ENSEMBLES

2023· dissertation· en· W4389934533 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Joshua D. Daniell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsProbabilistic logicSatelliteComputer scienceThermospherePerceptronArtificial neural networkMeteorologyMachine learningArtificial intelligenceGeographyEngineeringAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Commonly utilized space weather indices and proxies drive predictive models for thermosphere density, directly impacting objects in low-Earth orbit (LEO) by influencing atmospheric drag forces. A set of solar proxies and indices (drivers), F10.7, S10.7, M10.7, and Y10.7, are created from a mixture of ground based radio observations and satellite instrument data. These solar drivers represent heating in various levels of the thermosphere and are used as inputs by the JB2008 empirical thermosphere density model. The United States Air Force (USAF) operational High Accuracy Satellite Drag Model (HASDM) relies on JB2008, and forecasts of solar drivers made by a linear algorithm, to produce forecasts of density. Density forecasts are useful to the space traffic management community and can be used to determine orbital state and probability of collision for space objects. In this thesis, we aim to provide improved and probabilistic forecasting models for these solar drivers, with a focus on providing first time probabilistic models for S10.7, M10.7, and Y10.7. We introduce auto-regressive methods to forecast solar drivers using neural network ensembles with multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and long-short term memory (LSTM) models in order to improve on the current operational forecasting methods. We investigate input data manipulation methods such as backwards averaging, varied lookback, and PCA rotation for multivariate prediction. We also investigate the differences associated with multi-step and dynamic prediction methods. A novel method for splitting data, referred to as striped sampling, is introduced to produce statistically consistent machine learning data sets. We also investigate the effects of loss function on forecasting performance and uncertainty estimates, as well as investigate novel ensemble weighting methods. We show the best models for univariate forecasting are ensemble approaches using multi step or a combination of multi step and dynamic predictions. Nearly all univariate approaches offer an improvement, with best models improving between 48 and 59% on relative mean squared error (MSE) with respect to persistence, which is used as the baseline model in this work. We show also that a stacked neural network ensemble approach significantly outperforms the operational linear method. When using MV-MLE (multivariate multi-lookback ensemble), we see improvements in performance error metrics over the operational method on all drivers. The multivariate approach also yields an improvement of root mean squared error (RMSE) for F10.7, S10.7, M10.7, and Y10.7 of 17.7%, 12.3%, 13.8%, 13.7% respectively, over the current operational method. We additionally provide the first probabilistic forecasting models for S10.7,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207