MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389937595 · doi:10.1002/asmb.2835

Bayesian change point prediction for downhole drilling pressures with hidden Markov models

2023· article· en· W4389937595 on OpenAlexaff
Ochuko Erivwo, Viliam Makiš, Roy H. Kwon

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHidden Markov modelComputer scienceObservableBivariate analysisBayesian probabilityUnivariateBayesian inferenceAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMultivariate statisticsMachine learningPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the drilling of oil wells, the need to accurately detect downhole formation pressure transitions has long been established as critical for safety and economics. In this article, we examine the application of Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to oilwell drilling processes with a focus on the real time evolution of downhole formation pressures in its partially observed state. The downhole drilling pressure system can be viewed as a nonlinear, non‐degrading stochastic process whose optimum performance is in a region in its warning state prior to random failure in time. The differential pressure system is modeled as a hidden 3 state continuous time Markov process. States 0 and 1 are not observable and represent the normally pressured (initiating ) and abnormally pressured or warning (reducing ) states respectively. State 2 is the observable failure state (from negative and loss of well control). The signal process of the evolution of differential pressure is identified in the changes in the observable rate of penetration (ROP) encoded in drilling performance data. The state and observation parameters of the HMM are estimated using the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm and we show, for a univariate system with a depth dependent time relationship, that the model parameter updates of the EM algorithm equation have explicit solutions. A Bayesian inference model, to determine the safety threshold of the system and early failure prediction at each sampling epoch, is thereafter proposed. The application of our stochastic model of the dynamic evolution of downhole pressures in operational time is illustrated with a hindcast case example. The analysis showed strong early indication of probable failure in real time and was validated in the field post drilling system failure that resulted in significant recovery costs. The potential to predict the differential pressure state transitions ahead of the bit represents a capability not currently available in the industry. This opens up significant opportunity for value creation from optimizing drilling operations to deliver substantial savings in well construction costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Stochastic Models in Business and IndustrySame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207