MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 13723: Waitlist Outcomes for Pediatric Heart Transplantation in the Current Era: An Analysis of the PHTS Database

2023· article· en· W4389940363 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan J. Butts, Leah Toombs, James K. Kirklin, Kurt R. Schumacher, Jennifer Conway, Shawn C. West, Scott R. Auerbach, Neha Bansal, Hong Zhao, Ryan S. Cantor, Deipanjan Nandi, David M. Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransplantationHazard ratioCohortDilated cardiomyopathyDatabaseHeart transplantationCardiomyopathyInternal medicineProportional hazards modelHeart failureSubgroup analysisCardiologyPediatricsConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Waitlist mortality (WM) remains high in pediatric heart transplantation (HT). Allocation policy is a potential tool to help improve WM. This study aims to identify patients listed status 1A at highest risk for WM to potentially inform future allocation policy changes. Hypothesis: Significant variation in WM will exist even within highest urgency waiting status (1A). Methods: The pediatric heart transplant society database was queried for all patients <18 years of age listed for HT between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2021. WM was defined by death while awaiting transplant or being removed from the waitlist due to clinical deterioration. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing, and Cox-proportional hazard models were created to determine association with WM. Subgroup analysis was performed in 1A patients based upon body surface area (BSA) at time of listing, cardiac diagnosis, and presence of mechanical circulatory support. Results: Among 5,974 children listed, 3928 (65.8%) were status 1A. Patients listed 1A had a higher burden of WM (p<0.01) compared to patients listed status 1B or status 2. Among 1A patients, BSA<0.3m 2 , congenital heart disease (CHD), and lower eGFR was associated with higher WM. VAD support at listing was associated with lower WM (figure, all p-values<0.01) except in the single ventricle cohort (CHD-SV) (HR 2.13, p<0.01). For BSA<0.3m 2 listings, diagnosis other than dilated cardiomyopathy was associated with increased risk of WM . Prior cardiac surgery was associated with WM in the BSA 0.3-0.7m 2 and >0.7m 2 groups. ECMO was associated with increased risk of WM in all cohorts (HR 2.26, p<0.01). Conclusions: Significant variability exists in WM in patients listed 1A. Future changes to the pediatric allocation system should factor in the increased risk of WM in patients supported by ECMO, CHD-SV on VAD support, and small children with CHD, RCM or HCM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→