Selir Wandhan dalam Panji Jayalengkara Angreni: Tinjauan Sastra Bandingan Teks Panji dan Babad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Panji’s literary works in Java became a form of sign or pasemon in Javanese culture. Many of the narratives in Panji’s texts relate to Javanese traditional historiography. This research will focus on the story about Putri Wandhan in the Panji Jayalengkara Angreni text and the Babad texts. This study uses a comparative literary method and considers that Putri Wandhan’s narrative in the Panji Jayalengkara Angreni text contains a collective memory of history in the past. The emergence of the narrative about Putri Wandhan in Panji Jayalengkara Angreni and other Javanese literature is due to the contact of the Javanese and East Indonesian people in the past. In this study it was found that the story of Putri Wandhan describes the efforts of Javanese poets in the past to show the superiority of the Javanese kingdoms. In addition, this story is also a pasemon of the political life of the kingdoms in Java in the past. The story of the concubine from Wandhan in Panji Jayalengkara Angreni is an attempt to describe the superiority of the Javanese kings and an effort to honor their ancestors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".