MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389941172 · doi:10.37014/jumantara.v14i2.3282

Selir Wandhan dalam Panji Jayalengkara Angreni: Tinjauan Sastra Bandingan Teks Panji dan Babad

2023· article· en· W4389941172 on OpenAlexaff
Naufal Anggito Yudhistira, Priscila Fitriasih Limbong, Rias Antho Rahmi Suhardjo

Bibliographic record

VenueJumantara Jurnal Manuskrip Nusantara · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and Artistic Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeLiteraturePoliticsHistorySociologyArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Panji’s literary works in Java became a form of sign or pasemon in Javanese culture. Many of the narratives in Panji’s texts relate to Javanese traditional historiography. This research will focus on the story about Putri Wandhan in the Panji Jayalengkara Angreni text and the Babad texts. This study uses a comparative literary method and considers that Putri Wandhan’s narrative in the Panji Jayalengkara Angreni text contains a collective memory of history in the past. The emergence of the narrative about Putri Wandhan in Panji Jayalengkara Angreni and other Javanese literature is due to the contact of the Javanese and East Indonesian people in the past. In this study it was found that the story of Putri Wandhan describes the efforts of Javanese poets in the past to show the superiority of the Javanese kingdoms. In addition, this story is also a pasemon of the political life of the kingdoms in Java in the past. The story of the concubine from Wandhan in Panji Jayalengkara Angreni is an attempt to describe the superiority of the Javanese kings and an effort to honor their ancestors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJumantara Jurnal Manuskrip NusantaraSame topicCultural and Artistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207