Integrating knowledge representation into traffic prediction: a spatial–temporal graph neural network with adaptive fusion features
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Various external factors that interfere with traffic flow, such as weather conditions, traffic accidents, incidents, and Points of Interest (POIs), need to be considered in performing traffic forecasting tasks. However, the current research methods encounter difficulties in effectively incorporating these factors with traffic characteristics and efficiently updating them, which leads to a lack of dynamics and interpretability. Moreover, capturing temporal dependence and spatial dependence separately and sequentially can result in issues, such as information loss and model errors. To address these challenges, we present a Knowledge Representation learning-actuated spatial–temporal graph neural network (KR-STGNN) for traffic flow prediction. We combine the knowledge embedding with the traffic features via Gated Feature Fusion Module (GFFM), and dynamically update the traffic features adaptively according to the importance of external factors. To conduct the co-capture of spatial–temporal dependencies, we subsequently propose a spatial–temporal feature synchronous capture module (ST-FSCM) combining dilation causal convolution with GRU. Experimental results on a real-world traffic data set demonstrate that KR-STGNN has superior forecasting performances over diverse prediction horizons, especially for short-term prediction. The ablation and perturbation analysis experiments further validate the effectiveness and robustness of the designed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it