MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389941609 · doi:10.1101/2023.12.18.572232

High order expression dependencies finely resolve cryptic states and subtypes in single cell data

2023· preprint· en· W4389941609 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Abel Jansma, Yuelin Yao, Jareth C. Wolfe, Luigi Del Debbio, Sjoerd Viktor Beentjes, Chris P. Ponting, Ava Khamseh

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsMedical Research CouncilUniversity of Edinburgh
KeywordsEmbryonic stem cellCell typeCellGene expressionBiologyComputational biologyTranscriptomeGenePhenotypeCell biologySingle-cell analysisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract Single cells are typically typed by clustering in reduced dimensional transcriptome space. Here we introduce Stator, a novel method, workflow and app that reveals cell types, subtypes and states without relying on local proximity of cells in gene expression space. Rather, Stator derives higher-order gene expression dependencies from a sparse gene-by-cell expression matrix. From these dependencies the method multiply labels the same single cell according to type, sub-type and state (activation, differentiation or cell cycle sub-phase). By applying the method to data from mouse embryonic brain, and human healthy or diseased liver, we show how Stator first recapitulates other methods’ cell type labels, and then reveals combinatorial gene expression markers of cell type, state, and disease at higher resolution. By allowing multiple state labels for single cells we reveal cell type fates of embryonic progenitor cells and liver cancer states associated with patient survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207