La fallida reforma eléctrica del gobierno federal y las violaciones flagrantes al capítulo 14 del T-MEC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Free Trade Agreement signed between Canada, the United States and Mexico, signed on November 30, 2018, is an international instrument that makes it possible to attract foreign investment for Mexico, a circumstance that translates into the promotion of economic growth and development. This new trade agreement implies compliance with a series of specific rules in order to generate certainty, however, the failed electricity reform proposed by the Mexican government, disrupted such international treaty, particularly in relation to investments that since the 2013 electricity reform have been accumulating in the country, a circumstance that would particularly end up violating the rights of environmental protection as well as competition and free concurrence protected by the Constitution. In essence, this is a work that through the inductive method and a qualitative research approach, will compare Chapter 14 of the T-MEC with the alleged electricity reform proposed by the Executive Branch, and where it will show the lack of legal vision in the development of an initiative that clearly violated human rights and would have significantly affected Mexico's trade relations with the United States and Canada, but also with many other countries with similar investments in the domestic market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".