MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 16047: Quantifying the Cardiovascular Burden of Extreme Heat: A Meta-Analysis of Over 400 Laboratory-Based Heat Exposure Studies

2023· article· en· W4389944859 on OpenAlexaff
Robert D. Meade, Ashley P. Akerman, Sean R. Notley, Gregory W. McGarr, Emma R. McCourt, Nathalie V. Kirby, Joseph T. Costello, James D. Cotter, Craig G. Crandall, Antonella Zanobetti, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsHealth CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart ratePerfusionCardiologyCore temperatureInternal medicineMeta-analysisCardiac function curveBlood pressureHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Heat waves are associated with increased fatalities from cardiovascular events, which has been attributed to increased cardiac strain secondary to the effects of heat on cardiac function. However, our understanding of these adjustments has come primarily from laboratory research employing insulated/encapsulated heating modalities (hot water perfusion suits). We evaluated whether the cardiac responses seen in this work reflect those experienced in studies exposing participants to high ambient temperatures. Methods: We systematically reviewed studies published up to January 2023 examining cardiac outcomes in adults rendered hyperthermic with water perfusion suits or unencapsulated exposure in a climate chamber. Mixed effects meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate whether changes in each outcome with increasing core temperature were modified by heating modality. We also estimated associations (natural spline) between ambient heat index and thermal and cardiac responses in the climate chamber studies. Results: 584 effect estimates of the heat-induced increase in heart rate (primary outcome) from 406 studies were included (~6800 participant exposures). Heart rate was 7 beats/min [95% CI: 3, 13] greater in the perfusion suit vs. climate chamber studies for similar increases in core temperature (P<0.001). Likewise, there were greater elevations in cardiac output (slope difference: 1.2 L/min/°C [0.1, 2.3]), systolic pressure (14 mm Hg/°C [3, 24]), and rate pressure product (2923 mm Hg·beats/min/°C [1027, 4808]) with rises in core temperature in the perfusion suit compared to climate chambers studies (P≤0.036). In the climate chamber studies, core temperature and heart rate increased as much as 1.0°C [0.8, 1.3] and 31 beats/min [16, 37] (P<0.001) in conditions reflective of deadly North American heat waves (heat index: 50-67°C). Conclusions: Our understanding of the effect of heat on cardiovascular responses primarily comes from encapsulated heating modalities, which we show overestimate heat-induced cardiac burden. To support public health research on extreme heat, we provide the first empirical estimates demonstrating considerable thermal and cardiac strain is experienced in conditions reflective of deadly heat waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.040
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.339
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.033 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicClimate Change and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→