MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389951178 · doi:10.1353/rss.2023.a914944

More on Bertrand’s Brother

2023· article· en· W4389951178 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Timothy J. Madigan

Bibliographic record

VenueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrotherMathematical economicsMathematicsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More on Bertrand’s Brother Timothy J. Madigan (bio) Ruth Derham. To Be Frank: the Politics and Polemics of a Radical Russell. London: Spokesman, 2022. Pp. 206. isbn: 978-0-85124-9117; £16.99. In her magisterial biography of Frank Russell, Bertrand’s Brother: the Marriages, Morals and Misdemeanours of Frank, 2nd Earl Russell (reviewed in the summer 2021 issue of this journal) Ruth Derham brought back to life a figure all but forgotten, even by admirers of his brother, Bertrand. Frank Russell (1865–1931) was previously something of a cipher in the annals of the Russell family. He is a spectral figure in the various biographies of his younger brother, lurking in the background, referred to obliquely if at all even though Bertrand was almost 60 when Frank died. So theirs was a long as well as a complicated relationship (as is true of many siblings). I must admit that, before reading Derham’s biography, all I really knew about Frank was that he had taught Bertrand the rudiments of Euclidean geometry, had several complicated marriages and [End Page 190] divorces, served a prison term for bigamy, and was something like a real-life version of A. A. Milne’s Toad of Toad Hall—a blustering and reckless enthusiast for motor-cars with a proclivity for crashes. Derham did an exemplary job of showing what a complex man Frank was, as well as how intimately involved he was with many of the causes his brother is so identified with, including the promotion of birth control and women’s rights, political reform, freethought, and criticisms of organized religion. Now, in this companion volume, published by the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation’s Spokesman Books, Derham has collected a representative sample of Frank’s writings and speeches, which allow him to speak for himself. While his eccentricities are certainly in evidence—particularly his love for motoring and his dislike of speed limits on English country roads (see Chap. 5, “Automobilism”)—so too are his thoughtfulness and fearlessness, traits he certainly shared with his younger brother. In common with his brother as well, Frank had, to put it mildly, a complicated love life. This is dealt with in great detail in Bertrand’s Brother, including the convoluted reasons for his trial for bigamy in the House of Lords and subsequent imprisonment. In To Be Frank we get the chance to read his anguished pleas for the reform of British divorce law, which forced people to stay together who desired greatly to end their relationship. In a House of Lords debate on May 1, 1902 he argued: It often happens that persons make mistakes in their marriages. If we were all omniscient, no doubt we should all contract happy and successful marriages; but as it is, persons sometimes make mistakes, and in such contracts the Legislature ought, as far as possible, to enable the contracting parties to place themselves in the position they occupied before they made their mistake. I hold that the object of a well-thought-out system of divorce should be to provide a lawful method by which persons who contract such unfortunate alliances might free themselves. (P. 81) Alas, Frank was a voice crying in the wilderness, as divorce law would not be reformed until long after his death. Indeed, as Derham rightly points out, one reason why he has been so obscure for so long is due to the fact that he was often far ahead of his time: “Frank did not live to see many of his campaigns come to fruition and history is not so good at remembering such pioneers, especially when others took up the banner at a critical moment” (p. 1). But this collection shows us how in many ways it was Bertrand who took up the banner and did live to see many of his brother’s labours bear fruit. There is much fun to be had in reading To Be Frank, including humorous correspondence with George Bernard Shaw and George Santayana, a fascinating anecdote about knocking on the White House door when on a Grand Tour of America in 1886 and visiting with President Grover Cleveland (“whom I rather liked”) and his...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2640.118

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207