MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 18375: Improving Rate of Prenatal Diagnosis of Critical Congenital Heart Disease Despite the Covid19 Pandemic: A Canadian Multiprovincial Study

2023· article· en· W4389952910 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luke Eckersley, Jane Lougheed, Deborah Fruitman, Adrienn B.Szabo, Mrinal M Lad, Heili Poolsaar, Rose He, Lynne E. Nield, Varsha Thakur, Lisa K. Hornberger, Bhawna Arya, Lindsay R. Freud

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's HospitalAlberta Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioHamilton Health SciencesHospital for Sick ChildrenStollery Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePandemicPregnancyPediatricsPrenatal diagnosisCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Heart diseaseReferralCase fatality rateDiseaseObstetricsEpidemiologyInternal medicineFetusFamily medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Restriction to travel, reallocation of health resources and physical distancing during the COVID19 pandemic caused extraordinary health system strain, requiring limited tertiary referral acceptance. The overall impact of public health measures during COVID19 on diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) has not been explored. We sought to determine the rate, timing of diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes of critical CHD prior to and during the COVID era. Methods: Cases of CHD with due date/birth date from 1 Jan 2016 to 1 Mar 2022 that required or were anticipated to require neonatal intervention were identified from surgical and referring centres in Ontario and Alberta. Pregnancies were categorized as reaching 18 weeks GA before (pre-COVID) or after 1 March 2020 (COVID). Outcomes included timing of diagnosis (pre/postnatal), GA at prenatal diagnosis, and pregnancy outcome. Data are presented as mean, 95% CI or median (IQR); rank-sum comparison of continuous variables or Chi 2 comparison of proportions were used. Results: Prenatal diagnosis occurred in 1240/1823 (68% (65.8, 70.1)) of cases of critical CHD overall, with a pre-COVID rate of 867/1305 - 66% (64, 69) and COVID rate of 373/518 - 72% (68, 76), p=0.02. During COVID, earlier median GA at obstetric ultrasound (median GA: pre-COVID 20.1 (19.1, 22), COVID 19.9 (19.1,21.3), p=0.025) and diagnosis of CHD (median GA: pre-COVID 21.7 (20.3, 24.3), COVID 21.3 (20,23.3), p=0.006) occurred. Prenatal diagnosis before 22 weeks GA (pre-COVID 449/851, 52.3% vs COVID 219/371, 59%; p=0.043) and termination were more common during COVID (pre-COVID 28% (25,31), COVID 35% (30,40) p=0.015). Conclusion The rate of prenatal diagnosis of critical CHD continued to improve during the COVID pandemic in two of Canada’s largest provinces. Unexpectedly, obstetric ultrasounds occurred earlier, leading to earlier prenatal diagnosis of CHD. These findings may have implications for referral practices in the post-COVID era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→