MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389955122

Lessons Learned by Teachers During COVID-19 Pandemic

2021· article· en· W4389955122 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sadia Ahsin

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VirologyGeographyMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Outbreak
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic has globally brought significant transformation in educational activities worldwide.1 Pakistan, although suffered comparatively less than rest of the neighboring countries was and still is, one of the affected regions. In March 2020, with strict restrictions on social gatherings, the conventional education methods were suspended temporarily with an urgent need to shift to online teaching methods.2 Online education is electronically supported learning that relies on the Internet for teacher/learner interaction and the distribution of learning resources. It may include audiotaped lectures, videos, text,animations, virtual training environments, real-time online lectures and interactive sessions with teachers.3 Online learning methodology was adopted by the west, long before it was even introduced in Pakistan. Considering, that the first-ever completely online course was offered in 1984 by the University of Toronto,4 it seems that we are lagging far behind. The West, with its already existing online learning technology, had the economic strength to survive the pandemic, yet such online practice and technological advancement was not available to the developing countries like Pakistan. The shift from traditional classroom teaching to online teaching was a huge change to adapt to for all stakeholders including institutional administration, faculty, students, and parents. High-quality online teaching is not only difficult to execute, but it is more demanding than traditional on campus teaching. It requires more upfront planning and groundwork and more individualized response and assistance for learner and teacher for which we were not ready. 3Despite strenuous efforts there were many shortcomings and blunders on part of management, teachers and students due to poor technical skills, reluctance, time constraints, inadequate infrastructure and absence of institutional strategies and support. Just like any other educational institute of this region where online readiness was non-existent, medical colleges were no different in the face of this challenge. This urgent requirement to ‘move online’5 added to the stress and workload of university faculty and staff who were already struggling to balance existing teaching, research, and administrative duties, not to mention the stress related to their own health and safety concerns during pandemic. Power outages and connectivity issues at both learner and faculty end were also one of the recurring problems

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0080.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.505
GPT teacher head0.651
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207