MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 11695: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery in Patients With Aortic Valve Disease

2023· article· en· W4389956515 on OpenAlexaff
Aleksander Dokollari, Gianluca Torregrossa, Francesco Cabrucci, Marco Gemelli, Roberto Rodriguez, Edvin Prifti, Michel Pompeu, Beatrice Bacchi, Scott Goldman, Ali Fatehi Hassanabad, Serge Sicouri, Ramlawi Basel, Massimo Bonacchi

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAortic valve replacementStroke (engine)SurgeryCause of deathIntensive care unitMyocardial infarctionMechanical ventilationAortic valveCardiologyInternal medicineDiseaseStenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: We aim to analyze multicenter long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MI-AVR) in patients with aortic valve disease. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that MI-AVR provides good long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. Methods: All consecutive 1,972 patients undergoing MI-AVR with either ministernotomy (n= 986) or right anterior minithoracotomy (RAM, n=986) between 1999 and 2019, were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cardiac death. Results: Preoperatively, mean age was 72.1 (±13.7) year-old, and mean STS-PROM risk score was 0.38%. Intraoperatively, mean operative time (min) was 213.97 (± 56.9), while 313 (15.9%) patients were converted to full sternotomy. Postoperatively, 69 (3.5%) patients had prolonged mechanical ventilation (< 24 hours), 59 (3%) patients had re-exploration for bleeding, 10 (0.5%) patients had paravalvular leak (moderate/severe), 22 (1.1%) patients had non-fatal stroke, and 28 (1.4%) patients had non-fatal myocardial infarction. Mean intensive care unit stay was 14.45 (± 10.15) hours, and mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 7 (± 3.5) days. Thirty-day all-cause mortality occurred in 39 (2%) patients while 30-day cardiac-death occurred in 23 (1.2%) patients. Thirty-day predictors for all-cause mortality included age <75-years, post-operative LOS, peri-operative stroke, and RAM. Mean follow-up time was 10-years. At 20-year follow-up, all-cause death and CV-death incidence were 1156 (60%) and 170 (8.8%) patients, respectively. Valve-related deaths occurred in 33 (1.7%) patients. Long-term predictors for all-cause mortality included age <75-years, chronic kidney failure, mechanical ventilation <12 hours, RAM, and hospital LOS <10 days. Conclusions: MI-AVR is a safe, valid, and reproducible surgical procedure for patients with aortic valve disease. In addition, it provides good long-term outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→