MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 16761: Preprocedural Frailty is Associated With Lower Cardiac Rehabilitation Use Despite Greater Benefit

2023· article· en· W4389956994 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tyler M. Bauer, Hechuan Hou, Donald S. Likosky, Francis D. Pagani, Steven J. Keteyian, Devraj Sukul

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuartileLogistic regressionRehabilitationCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyRevascularizationInternal medicineGuidelineStroke (engine)Emergency medicinePhysical therapyGerontologyMyocardial infarctionConfidence intervalAngina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Increased frailty before cardiovascular procedures is associated with poorer outcomes. While underutilized, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is guideline-recommended for patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures and may help mitigate frailty through individualized, monitored exercise and risk factor reduction. Research Question/Hypothesis: Evaluate the relationship between preprocedural frailty, CR use, and one-year mortality. Methods: Medicare fee-for-service claims data were queried for patients who underwent inpatient percutaneous or surgical revascularization or aortic valve replacement between July 2016 and December 2018. Patients were stratified into quartiles (Q1 through Q4) using the validated claims-based frailty index. CR use was defined as attending any CR session within one year of discharge. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression was used to compare CR use across increasing frailty quartiles, and inverse probability treatment weighting was used to evaluate the effect of CR on one-year mortality across frailty quartiles. Results: Overall CR enrollment among the 570,851 beneficiaries was 35.3%; increasing frailty was associated with decreased CR use (unadjusted: frailty Q1: 48.3% vs Q4: 20.6%, p<0.001; adjusted OR: 0.61, p<0.001). Unadjusted one-year mortality was lower among CR users as opposed to non-users (2.7% vs 14.6%). After weighted adjustment, the absolute reduction in mortality associated with CR use was greater among frailer patients (Q4: -12.2%) relative to less frail patients (Q1: -2.9%) (Figure). Significant interaction effects between CR use and frailty quartiles indicated stronger associations of CR on mortality among more frail patients. Conclusions: Preprocedural frailty was associated with lower CR use despite greater absolute benefits on one-year mortality. Increasing CR enrollment in frail patients may enhance outcomes after cardiac interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→