MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 15635: Sex Differences in the Effect of Nocturnal Hypoxia on Right Ventricular Myocardial Blood Flow

2023· article· en· W4389957047 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sohum Kapadia, Magdalena Malczewska, Attila Fehér, Robert A. deKemp, Ran Klein, H. Klar Yaggi, Edward J. Miller, Albert J. Sinusas, Stephanie Thorn, Ehimen Aneni

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Canadian institutionsOttawa Heart InstituteMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypoxia (environmental)NocturnalInternal medicineCardiologyVentricleEndocrinologyOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Nocturnal hypoxia is common in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, it is unclear how nocturnal hypoxia affects the structure and function of the right ventricle (RV), and if there are sex differences in the impact of nocturnal hypoxia on RV dysfunction. We examined the sex-specific relationship between nocturnal hypoxia, as measured as T90% (time asleep with <90% oxygen saturation), and RV myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Methods: RV MBF and MFR were examined for 78 patients who had a cardiac PET stress test and a sleep test between 2015 to 2019. MBF was analyzed using FlowQuant software (Ottawa, Canada). MFR was defined as the ratio of stress to rest MBF. We categorized reduced RV MFR as < 2.3 (corresponding to the median value) and nocturnal hypoxia as T90 ≥ 8%. Results: The mean (± SD) age was 63 ± 10 years. Most patients (83%) were obese (BMI ≥ 30kg/m3). Fifty-one patients (63%) were female. Although not statistically significant, the median RV MFR was higher among females (2.4 vs. 2.2, p = 0.158). RV MFR was higher among those without nocturnal hypoxia compared to those with nocturnal hypoxia (2.4 vs. 2.0, p = 0.023). Among females, the median RV MFR was higher among those without significant nocturnal hypoxia (2.5 vs. 1.8, p = 0.004), while males showed no relationship (2.2 vs. 2.2, p = 0.696; see table for details). In age and BMI adjusted logistic regression analysis, patients with nocturnal hypoxia were 3X as likely to have reduced RV MFR (OR = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.1 - 9.3) and there was a significant statistical interaction by sex (p = 0.046). Conclusions: These findings suggest that nocturnal hypoxia is associated with a reduction in RV MFR, more prominently among females. Future studies should focus on elucidating the pathophysiologic implications of our findings and understanding the biologic processes that account for the sex differences observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular and Diving-Related ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207