MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 14449: Long-Term Colchicine for Cardiovascular and Limb Risk Reduction in Peripheral Artery Disease

2023· article· en· W4389958090 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Heindel, James J. Fitzgibbon, Eric A. Secemsky, Deepak L. Bhatt, Mohammed Al‐Omran, Subodh Verma, Ibrahim Almaghlouth, Arin L. Madenci, Mohamad A. Hussain

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Artery Disease Management
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMaceGoutInternal medicineConfoundingHazard ratioMarginal structural modelAdverse effectColchicineRandomized controlled trialSurgeryCardiologyConfidence intervalMyocardial infarctionPercutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Evidence from randomized trials suggests colchicine may reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease. Colchicine's effect in lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is not known. Methods: To make inferences about the real-world effectiveness of colchicine in PAD, we emulated a pragmatic target trial, leveraging variable prescription durations when adding colchicine to urate lowering therapy in patients with gout and PAD. Eligible patients received care at a multicenter academic health system between July 2007 and December 2019. Electronic health records were linked to Medicare claims data. Patients received either colchicine indefinitely (long-term) or for 3 months (short-term) and the observational analog of the per-protocol effect was estimated. Inverse probability weighted marginal structural models were used to adjust for potential confounding, immortal-time, and collider-stratification biases. The primary outcome was a 2-year composite of major adverse limb events (MALE), MACE, and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 1,025 patients were enrolled; mean age was 77 years (SD 7), 32% were female, and 9% were non-white race. The risk of the primary composite outcome at 2 years was 31.2% (95% CI 26.9, 35.2) in the long-term colchicine group and 32.7% (29.6, 36.4) in the short-term group (Figure), with a risk difference of -1.6% (-6.3, 3.4) and risk ratio of 0.95 (0.82, 1.11). Beyond 2 years, risk estimates of secondary outcomes in each group diverged, but confidence intervals also widened (Figure). Conclusions: In a real-world sample of high-risk patients with PAD and gout, estimates of the effect of colchicine provided no conclusive evidence that colchicine decreased the risk of adverse cardiovascular or limb events and death. The cardiovascular and limb benefits of colchicine in older comorbid populations with PAD and advanced systematic atherosclerosis remain uncertain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207