MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 16062: Acute Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19: Initial Insights From the IMPACT-COVID-19 Study

2023· article· en· W4389958599 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexander Calderone, M. Benharrats, Roxanne Coderre, Matthias G. Friedrich, Alain Piché, Emilia Liana Falcone, Michael Chetrit, Mary Ann Fitzcharles, C. Boudreault, Michel Nguyen, Jiayi Ni, T. Huynh

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPericarditis and Cardiac Tamponade
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de SherbrookeMcGill University Health CentreHôpital FleurimontJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePericarditisMyocarditisInternal medicineAcute pericarditisChest painPericardial effusionCardiologyOdds ratioMyopericarditis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Myocarditis and/or pericarditis were reported in patients with Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Goals: We aim to determine the prevalences, risk factors, and discriminative values of inflammatory biomarkers for acute myocarditis/pericarditis in patients with PASC. Methods: IMPACT-COVID-19 is an ongoing prospective longitudinal cohort enrolling adults with PASC and at least one symptom suggestive of potential cardiac disorder (dyspnea, palpitation, chest pain and dizziness) in Quebec, Canada (years 2021-ongoing). We obtained baseline inflammatory, cardiac biomarkers, electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We defined myocarditis/pericarditis as either 1) positive Lake Louise criteria on CMR, 2) pericardial effusion or 3) chest pain with elevated cardiac biomarkers or inflammatory biomarkers. Results: The following results were based on the initial 256 patients enrolled (with a median of 279 days after their initial COVID-19 infection). Most were female (73%), and White (86%) with a mean age of 45 years. Seventy-six patients (30%) had acute myocarditis and/or pericarditis. One hundred and three patients (40%) had an emergency room (ER) visit for the index COVID infection and this was associated with an increased risk of myocarditis/ pericarditis: (odds ratio: 2.39 (95% confidence intervals: 1.21, 4.72). The ESR was elevated in patients with myocarditis/pericarditis compared to patients without myocarditis/pericarditis (18 mm/h vs 12 mm/h; p:0.02). There was no observed difference in CRP (1.85 mg/L for patients with myocarditis/pericarditis versus 1.54 mg/L for patients without myocarditis/pericarditis, p:0.51). ROC c-statistics were 0.61 for ESR and 0.49 for CRP. An ESR of ≥14 mm/h has the best predictive value for myo/pericarditis. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that clinicians should be aware that patients with PASC, especially those who required an ER visit for their COVID-19 infection, are at increased risk for acute myocarditis/pericarditis. ESR should also be considered in the diagnostic tests for PASC-related myocarditis/pericarditis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicPericarditis and Cardiac TamponadeFrench-language works237,207